spock did not give his life so you could draw jim kirk with a flat stomach
(via bmouse)
spock did not give his life so you could draw jim kirk with a flat stomach
(via bmouse)
I was thinking about picking up some PG Wodehouse. But then when I went looking for the first book in the series, I discovered that Fry and Laurie did a television show based on this. Does anybody have any advice on whether I should jump into the books or the TV first? Because on the one hand, books, and on the other hand, Fry and Laurie.
Honestly, they are both delightful, and don’t do each other any harm. Spoilers are not a thing you need to be concerned about with Jeeves and Wooster. I watched the TV series first, (probably about a dozen times…) and I feel like it only added to my reading experience. Which my followers can tell you has been one of obsessive glee.
I also watched first and then read, and I think for the most part it doesn’t matter.
The one thing that surprised me the most when I switched from the show to the books was that a bunch of the short stories were so simple compared to the televisions show’s plots, which often combined and wove together elements of two or three of the short stories into one episode. Some of them fit so seamlessly I was baffled to find their parts separate.
Honestly, now that I’m thinking about it, I think I would sort of steer people to watch it first, as blasphemous as I’m sure that sounds, because I think that the few changes that were made with regard to Bingo and Tuppy and a few others might make some people a little grumpy to see after watching them in the books. You can’t be upset by how something was interpreted or changed with the show if you watch it first, and then when you read the stories, you get a feeling of enjoying both slightly different versions of the world, or even mentally blend them.
(via indigobluerose)
www.martinsfrancisco.tumblr.com
• Photography/post-production/styling: Francisco Martins Photography
• Model: Paulo Pascoal (actor)
__
For more pictures of this model check out my tumblr or my facebook photography page.
*_*
Wow
(via feltelures)
Porky Pig’s speech pattern deconstructed.
BRUH
:O that was amazing
I always thought they were just random sounds. That’s kind of mind-blowing.
I’m over this man for making it seem so simple lol
“And nobody can do that and that’s why I have job security.”
VOICE ACTING IS A FUCKING SCIENCE.
This whole documentary is called ‘i know that voice’ and it’s great.
(via radioactivesoup)
I still feel like I’m not doing enough. Not impressive enough, not dedicated enough, just not enough.
And I know I have to tackle that the same way I’m tackling everything else - do everything for me and fuck everyone else’s feelings on the matter - but I am not succeeding terribly well today.
Women boxing on a roof, circa 1930s
THIS IS LITERALLY THE RADDEST PHOTO I’VE EVER SEEN
LIKE SHIT
ARE YOU KIDDING
(via cicerothewriter)
Dolly Haas as Pat Caverley in Girls Will Be Boys [d: Marcel Varnel, 1934]
This is in no way the English version of the previous year’s German Viktor und Viktoria, (it doesn’t have the knowing sophistication of that film’s genderswapping, for a start, although the ‘reveal’ scene is not at all coy) or the following year’s American Sylvia Scarlett (how I love the mid-30s trend for women dressing as men) but it’s a lovely little comedy, has Esmond Knight at his dark-eyed thick-haired swooniest as the romantic interest, and Dolly Haas is bloody marvellous as Pat; adorable, boyish, bolshy and delivers my menswear trifecta of tweed/dressing gown/chunky knit, with bonus evening wear.
(via cicerothewriter)