rasie your hand if you are 20+ and in the star trek fandom?
For science!!
(via maketreknotwar)
Regarding his [angry] reaction to [Bashir’s genetic enhancement storyline]:
Jordan Hoffman: What did the other cast members think? Were they on your side or did they think you were being crazy?
Alexander Siddig: I had a reputation for being a bit of a crank, yeah. They thought I was being cranky. I had this – there was one time I got furious because none of us were being paid royalties on our - this is rubbish, not important for the real world - but, nevertheless, we weren’t being paid royalties on our photographs. So I changed my name for a number of reasons, but that was one of them. So that they would have to re-do all the photographs, all the press with all the right name on it.
And I didn’t turn up to the big photo call for the season’s photo. So there’s one season’s photo of Deep Space Nine – the cast, without me in it which is the one I didn’t turn up to. And being a naïve twenty-something year-old, I didn’t realize that they immediately turned around and fired the head of marketing. So there was a real significant impact for me being such a childish brat.
”if i ship a fictional heterosexual couple their writers should congratulate themselves
(via feltelures)
doomedredshirtFaun Cosplay
Annnnd I am in love.
, I think we’ve been 1-uppedThis is so cute!
I freakin’ love this cosplay damn
(via radioactivesoup)
Whoa. [x]
Don’t tell them that it’s found all across indo-european ;)
Ooh, I was trying to find this so I could tell y’all all about it.
It gets better, tho.
In most Proto-Indo-European reconstructions, we have a four-way distinction between interrogative pronouns (“what?”, “where?”), relative pronouns (“what” in “that’s what I’m doing”, “where” in “that’s where I’m going”), proximal demonstratives (“this”, “here”) and distal demonstratives (“that”, “there”). In most cases, the difference between these was a single sound.
Take a reconstructed root *kwo - meaning “what?” (interrogative). In masculine nominative, this would have been *kwos. The relative form of this (“what” - not a question) would have been *yos. The proximal demonstrative pronoun (“this”) is often reconstructed as *sos, and the distal form (“that”) is usually thought to have been *tos.
You can see relics of this system in “where” and “there.” <wh> comes directly from Indo-European /kw/ and <th> (pronounced /ð/ as in there) comes from IE /t/. In fact the words “what” and “that” are direct reflexes of the neuter forms of the IE “what” words given above: *kwod and *tod. Changing the sound at the beginning of the question word has been answering the question for about 5000 years.
But wait, there’s more. Most of this system has collapsed over the years in many IE languages, but in a few, nearly all of it is still around. In Hindi and Urdu, this is the case (though the system gets messy for “who” and “what” and a little bit for “how”), and there are probably others.
तुम कहां जा रहा हो? (Tum kahā̃ jā rahā ho?) - Where are you going?
जहां जगह मैं जा रहा हूँ वही है। (Jahā̃ jagah maĩ jā rahā hū̃ vahī hai.) - That is the place where I am going.
हर दिन, मैं यहां आता हूँ। (Har din, maĩ yahā̃ ātā hū̃.) - Every day, I come here.
हर दिन, मैं वहां जाता हूँ। (Har din, maĩ vahā̃ jātā hū̃.) - Every day, I go there.
Interrogative = <k>, relative = <j>, proximal = <y>, distal = <v>. The precise sound values have changed from the IE state, but the regularity is still there. This is like, if in English we said:
“Where are you going?”
“I’m going there.”
“Here?”
“No, there. Over there is yere I’m going.”or
"What do you have in your hand?”
“Oh, sat thing? Nothing.”
"I want that.”
“Tough shit, you don’t get to have yat I have.”
(via tinsnip)
(via bmouse)
Bisexual women and lesbians would give violets to the woman they were wooing, symbolizing their “Sapphic” desire. Sappho described, in a poem, herself and a lover wearing garlands of violets. The giving of violets was popular in the 1920s, 30s and 40s.
(via propheticfire)